英语900句 | 英语口语8000句 | 旅游英语 | 李阳英语365句 | 商务英语口语 | 面试英语  | 地道英语 | 英语短文 | 英文文章 | 英语诗歌 |

英语情景对话 | 英语句型 | 英语语法 | 英语阅读 英语写作 | 英语口语学习 | 英语单词 | 英语故事 | 英语笑话 | 英语名言 | 英语谚语 |

流行美语100课 | 英语导读1000句 | 英语日常用语 | 电话英语 | 酒店英语 | 实用英语 | 求职英语 | 英语祝福语 | 英语文化 | 英语教学 |

  网站首页  英语听力练习  日常英语  英语学习方法  英语文章  英文歌曲  英语学习书籍

 天才英语学习网 > 英语文章 > 英语新闻 > 正文

新加坡:走自己的路

新加坡:走自己的路

in his article, “our de-vocalised public space”, (lhzb, 1 nov) chan cheow pong deplored the lack of political space here for argument and debate. in “a letter to my dad aka the government” (lhzb, 15 nov), julie ng siew choo continued this theme.   

mr chan cites as proof the lack of anti-us demonstrations over iraq during the recent visit of president george bush in singapore. unfortunately, he did not explain how such demonstrations would have been in our national interest.   

on freedom of speech in singapore, mr chan fails to distinguish between form and substance. the substantive issue must surely be whether singaporeans have a right to a different view and whether they have effective avenues to express them.   

the answer is clearly“yes”as is amply demonstrated by many singaporeans exercising this right in the forum pages of the newspapers, the internet and elsewhere. the space for political debate has gradually but steadily widened. that mr chan could publish such a critical piece in lianhe zaobao shows this to be so.   

as a form, street protests may be an accepted channel for expression in other countries in other circumstances. in singapore we have different but effective avenues for expression.   

mr chan is dismissive of them, arguing that because the government defines these alternatives, they are tantamount to restrictions on an individual’s political space. mr chan advocates that “society”, but not the elected government, should decide the boundaries of political action and expression.    fail to do so effectively, the electorate can vote them out in the next election. every individual in such a society lives within the framework of policies and laws determined by the elected government.   

ms julie ng asked why the government still needs to censor films at all, since she is already 21. but censorship is not just a question of age, but societal norms of public decency and morality. even in western countries like the uk and australia, censorship boards decide what can or cannot be shown publicly in films. every country needs to uphold the &#118alues affirmed by the majority of its population. in no country is individual freedom absolute.   

singapore society must evolve and grow on its own terms and at its own pace. just because we refuse to ape other societies mindlessly in having street demonstrations or in our censorship standards does not make singaporeans a“de-vocalised” lot, or signify any lack of idealism or self-mobilisation.   

on the contrary, it underlines a growing maturity and confidence in our own model, which has enabled singapore to grow and prosper. ·the writer is member of parliament for holland-bukit panjang grc

 

上一篇文章:
下一篇文章:

相关文章:

 周杰伦复旦大学教书
 英语新闻:与巴菲特共进午餐
 瑞士进口土豆力保薯条供应
 英国小姐参选议员
 澳大利亚_魔法苹果切开不变黄
 新加坡:走自己的路
 英语新闻:首位女太空游客9月18日飞赴空间站
 新生缺陷儿增长迅速 环境污染是主因
 美国媒体盛传布兰妮二度当妈
 饮酒人士挣钱多 善交际应酬


在线听力          

天才英语学习网 www.english767.com